Special Education Due Process and Procedural Violations - 2 Things You Must Know!

Are you the parent of a child with a disability receivingcourts have stated that it is not enough for the parent
special education services? Are you considering filingto just attend the IEP meeting, they must have
for a due process hearing on procedural violations of"meaningful participation!" One court was extremely
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)?clear that if a district rejects a specific
This article will explain the changes to IDEA thatrecommendation for placement or services need by
occurred in 2004 when it was reauthorized, in the areathe parent, regardless of evidence that the placement
of procedural violations, and explain what you as aand services are appropriate for the child, and will
parent need to know, about this change.meet the child's educational needs, this may result in a
A procedural violation means that the school district didprocedural violation that denies the child FAPE.
not follow the specific procedures that are required inIn a well known special education case the school
IDEA. For example: IDEA requires that parents aredistrict refused to provide a child with Applied
equal participants in the Individual Educational Plan (IEP)Behavioral Analysis (ABA), even though there was a
meetings for their child. If special education personnellot of evidence that the child required it. Special
refuse to allow the parent to give input, this would be aeducation personnel were ecstatic with the child's
procedural violation. Or if timelines are not followed forprogress with the private ABA program, but they
testing this would also be a procedural violation.refused to pay for it. The court in that particular case
Before IDEA was reauthorized in 2004 when a parentstated that the school district was not going to agree
filed for a due process hearing, the hearing officerwith the parents request for ABA, no matter what.
could find that a child was denied a Free AppropriateTherefore the parents were prevented from having
Public Education if procedural violations occurred.meaningful participation in the development of their
Things you must know about the change:child's IEP, and this denied their child FAPE; which made
1. IDEA now states that any procedural violations mustthe school district liable for paying for the program.
be substantive or in other words substantial. The2. Denial of educational benefit is a little harder to
procedural violation must rise to the level of preventingprove, but I think it is doable. If the school district
the child from receiving a free appropriate publicrefused to listen to parents about a related service
education (FAPE).that their child needed, and it prevented FAPE, then this
2. There are 2 ways that a school districts proceduralwould be a deprivation of educational benefit.
violation rises to the level of denying the child FAPE.Another example would be if a parent had an
They are:Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) that stated
A. The violation significantly impeded the parentsthat their child needed a Multi sensory reading program
opportunity to participate in the decision makingfor 1 hour 5 days a week with a trained teacher, and
process regarding the provision of FAPE to thethe school district refused to listen to them. This would
student ordeny the child educational benefit and could be a denial
B. The violation caused a deprivation of educationalof FAPE.
benefit.While this change has made it a little more difficult to
I would like to discuss each of these:prove denial of a free appropriate public education at
1. Many school districts have tried to convince courtsdue process, it makes it a little more clear for parents
that parents have participated in the IEP process ifas they are preparing their case. Good luck and
they just simply attended the IEP meeting. But a fewremember your child is depending on you!