VRI Vs VRS

For members of the deaf community conversant inthem. Depending on the situation, a qualified interpreter
American Sign Language (ASL), Video Relay Servicesmay be mandatory as a reasonable accommodation
(VRS) and Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) bothunder the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
provide valuable tools for communicating with theespecially in medical and legal situations.
hearing world.VRI is not limited by geography. You can take
VRS is a form of Telecommunications Relay Servicesadvantage of VRI from any place in the world with a
(TRS) which:webcam and high speed Internet connection. VRI is
1. allows those with hearing disabilities access to thenow the first choice for hospitals where the need for
telephone systeman ASL interpreter cannot always be scheduled in
2. allows the deaf to use American Sign Languageadvance.
instead of a text telephone (TTY) to call a hearingIn-person sign language interpreters usually:
individual over normal telephone lines* must be booked 24 hours in advance to avoid higher
3. permits the use of a high speed Internet connectioncharges
plus a web cam or video conferencing equipment to* require a two-hour minimum fee, no matter how
access a Communications Assistant (CA) in a callshort the actual interpreting needs
center* charge a 2 hour minimum fee if the job is not
4. relies on the CA to relay information to and from acanceled 24 hours in advance
hearing person on their telephone* charge if the client is a no-show, such as a deaf
5. also permits a hearing person to initiate a call to thestudent skipping a class
deaf individualVRI can:
The FCC covers the costs of all VRS calls through1. substitute for live interpreters when not available
the Interstate TRS Fund. Calls are free to both parties2. cut the cost to private medical offices and schools
and are "relayed" by the CA, who is a skilled, qualifiedwho are required to provide sign language interpreters
ASL interpreter.but who are not reimbursed by the TRS Fund
The FCC mandates that VRS is only to be used in a3. make sign language available in secure environments
situation where the deaf individual would have made asuch as prisions, interrogation rooms, and hazardous
typical voice call through the telephone system were itmedical environments
not for the disability. VRS may not be used as a4. available on demand at no extra charge
replacement for a live interpreter.5. no additional charges for last second assignments or
VRI serves a different purpose. With VRI, both thecancellations
deaf and hearing persons are situated in the same6. get rid of "in-person" interpreter fees for travel and
place, such as a hospital, school, college classroom,parking
courtroom, police station, prison, or any other locationFCC concerns over illegal use of VRS instead of VRI
where a live sign language interpreter is unavailable.continue. While VRS providers have systems in place
Fees for VRI are paid for by the party requestingto detect improper calls, no system is perfect.