Disability: Human Rights and Social Responsibility - By Dr Shanker Adawal

Over two thirds of them live in developing countries.means of transport and communication. The impact of
Only 2 per cent of disabled children in the developingwell-directed legislation in the long run would be
world receive any education or rehabilitation. The linkprofound and liberating. One out of every ten people in
between disability and poverty and social exclusion isIndia suffers from one form of disability or the other
direct and strong throughout the world. India is not farthat is they possess physical or mental impairment
behind as the statistics shows it has over 90 millionsubstantially limits one or more of major life activities.
disabled persons, barely one percent of whom areInother words, 90 million of our countrymen live with,
employed.and learn to overcome in their own individual ways,
The disability rights debate is not so much about theproblems which non-disabled can seldom understand.
enjoyment of specific rights as it is about ensuring theThe law should enable not only one in ten people but
equal effective enjoyment of all human rights, withoutalso nine out of every ten people to lead their lives to
discrimination, by people with disabilities. Thetheir fullest potential. The law declares that disability
non-discrimination principle helps make human rights inneed not be an insurmountable handicap as long as it
general relevant in the specific context of disability.can be properly understood and catered for. The law
Non-discrimination, and the equal effective enjoymentattempts to eradicate factors which produce low
of all human rights by people with disabilities, isself-esteem in disabled people and empowers them to
long-overdue reform in the way disability and theconfront the insensitivity and ignorance of others.
disabled are viewed throughout the world. TheThe Legal Framework
process of ensuring that people with disabilities enjoyA comprehensive Act known as Persons with
their human rights is slow and uneven. But the goodDisabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights
thing is it has started taking place, in all economic andand Full Participation) Act 1995 (Act 1 of 1996) was
socialsystems. It is inspired by the values that underpinunanimously passed by both the houses of Parliament
human rights: the inestimable dignity of each and everyon 22nd December 1995, which got the assent of the
human being, the concept of autonomy orPresident on 1st January 1996. The Act has 14
self-determination that demands that the person bechapters and seeks to:a) Spell out the state's
placed at the center of all decisions affecting him/her,responsibility towards prevention of impairments and
the inherent equality of all regardless of difference, andprotection of disabled people's rights in health,
the ethic of solidarity that requires society to sustaineducation, training, employment and rehabilitation;b)
the freedom of the person withappropriate socialWork to create a barrier-free environment for disabled
supports.peoplec) Work to remove discrimination in the sharing
Global Scenarioof development benefitsd) Counteract any abuse or
Over the past two decades a dramatic shift inexploitation of disabled peoplee) Lay down strategies
perspective has taken place from an approachfor a comprehensive development of programmes
motivated by charity towards the disabled to oneand services and for equalization of opportunities for
based on rights. In essence, the human rightsdisabled people; andf) Make provision for the
perspective on disability means viewing people withintegration of disabled people into the social
disabilities as subjects and not as objects. It entailsmainstream.
moving away from viewing people with disabilities asThe Act has been in effect from 7th February 1996.
problems towards viewing them as holders of rights.Enforcement
Importantly, it means locating problems outside theOne of the weaknesses of much of the legislation has
disabled person and addressing the manner in whichbeen that the enforcement of their provisions has
various economic and social processes accommodatebeen left to the Courts of Law without specifying
the difference of disability - or not, as the case maysummary procedures to be followed in the event
be. The debate about the rights of the disabled isofproceedings under the respective legislations. This
therefore connected to a larger debate about themakes it difficult for persons with disabilities who
place of difference in society.usually have limited resources and legal knowledge to
The shift to the human rights perspective is alsoparticipate in complicated, lengthy and expensive legal
reflected in the fact that national institutionsfor theprocess.
promotion and protection of human rights throughoutAt the same the definition of disability as given in 1995
the world have begun to take an active interest inAct needs to be widen to protect the rights of people
disability issues. This is important since these institutionssuffering from HIV, leprosy and internal organ failure.
help in providing a bridgebetween international humanCurrently the Act gives protection to those suffering
rights law and domestic debates about disability lawfrom, blindness, low vision, leprosy cured, hearing
and policy reform. National institutions are strategicimpaired, mental retardation, mental illness and
partners in the process of change, and their increasinglocomotor disability. There are 600 million people in the
engagement on the issue of human rights for personsworld, nearly ten percent of the world's population, who
with disabilities is a highly encouraging sign for thesuffer from one disability or the other. Of these, 90
future.million are from India. However, even then, the total
People with disabilities themselves are now framingpercentage of the disabled people in India is just six
their long-felt sense of grievance and injustice into theper cent of its population while in the developed nation
language of rights. Isolated injustices need no longer belike USA the disabled population's percentage is nine
experienced in isolation. NGOs working with disabilitypercent.
issues such as the collaborative project DisabilityThis is not because there are more disabled persons in
Awareness in Action arebeginning to see themselvesUSA but because the definition of disability is wider in
also as human rights NGOs. They are beginning toUSA. Besides limited scope, there are some other
collect and process hard information on allegedlacunae in the act too. There are no guidelines and no
violations of the human rights of persons withdeadlines set for non-adherence. Most government
disabilities. While still relatively limited, their human rightsand semi-government organisations do not strictly
capacities are growing. A similar process offollow the guidelines to reserve three per cent jobs for
self-transformation is under way within traditionaldisabledand yet they go unpunished. Also, as per the
human rights NGOs, which are increasinglyAct the compensation is to be awarded to a disabled
approaching disabilityas a mainstream human rightsas per the financial capacity of the employer. The
issue. This is important, since these NGOs have highlyemployers often take advantage of this clause. Also, a
developed structures, and the development of aprovision to award some temporary relieves, till the
healthy synergy between disability NGOs andcase is decided, to the affected (disabled) employee
traditional human rights NGOs is not only long overdue,needs to be incorporated. In the age of growing
but inevitable. States parties are demonstrably movingconsumerism and glamour this is how we view them,
in the direction of the human rights perspective on"Customs duties on semi-precious stones and raw
disability. Recent research shows that 39 States in allcultured pearls is 5 percent while the duty on hearing
parts of the world have adopted non-discrimination oraids is 15 percent. If cordless phones are charged only
equal opportunity legislation in the context of disability.15 percent duty, the disabled shell out 25 percent as
States parties' dialogue with the human rights treatysurcharge on crutches and artificial limbs."
bodies is constructive in the context oftheir efforts toConclusion
secure disability reform; a significant amount of goodThe act has come a long way since its inception and
practice now exists on a worldwide basis, which canthe real danger now is that those who had been
be usefully propagated through the human rights treatyvigorously demanding its enactment might become
system.complacent and think that the job has been done. The
The Indian ExperienceAct must be implemented in schools and colleges, in
The human rights movement in India has boldly andfactories and workplaces, in transport and shopping
categorically shifted the attention of policy makerscenters. People with disabilities, and those who care
from the mere provision of charitable services tofor them, must ensure thatdiscrimination is outlawed
vigorously protecting their basic right to dignity andand barriers are removed as much from the physical
self-respect. In the new scenario, the disabled areenvironment as from the attitudes of ordinary people.
viewed as individuals with a wide range of abilities andThe real battle for the right to full citizenship and active
each one of them willing and capable to utilize his/herparticipation of disabled people is ahead. The Act is
potential and talents. Society, on the other hand, is seencomprehensive but must be enforced with sincerity
as the real cause of the misery of people withand determination. "What is disability - your frame of
disabilities since it continuesto put numerous barriers asmind is the real disability". Let us change our attitudes
expressed in education, employment, architecture,and help to change others. Make a commitment to end
transport, health and dozens of other activities.unfair and unfounded prejudices. Open minds and
In a country like India the numbers of the disabled aredoors to people with disabilities. Repeat in speeches,
so large, their problems so complex, availablewritings and films three words: Disability, Equality,
resources so scarce and social attitudes so damaging,Liberty. Listen to disabled people. Serve disabled
it is only legislation which can eventually bring about apeople. Work with disabledpeople. Travel with disabled
substantial change in a uniform manner. Althoughpeople. Shop with disabled people. Have them as
legislation cannot alone radically change the fabric of afriends. Mere changing the Acts and passing
society in a short span of time, it can nevertheless,legislation's will not help. The need is to change the
increase accessibility of the disabled to education andattitude of the society.
employment, to public buildings and shopping centers, to