| Social Security has a set of Impairment | | | | problem. We won but the primary focus of |
| Listings. At one time "obesity" had an | | | | the decision was on the back problem and |
| impairment listing. Thus, if the | | | | not her "obesity." |
| applicant was of a certain height and | | | | In another case I had the applicant was |
| weight, then the applicant received | | | | a man who was over 375 pounds with |
| Disability. For example, if you were | | | | congestive heart failure. Again, prior |
| 5'2" and 300 pounds, then you were well | | | | to 1999 he would have met the "obesity" |
| on your way to winning a Disability Case | | | | listing. Instead, we had the hearing and |
| if you had any impairments in addition | | | | the judge denied the claim on the |
| to your "obesity". | | | | grounds he had not done enough to lose |
| In 1999, Social Security changed the | | | | weight. The United States District Court |
| Rules and deleted the Impairment Listing | | | | reversed the social security judge and |
| for "obesity". Social Security did say | | | | we are awaiting a new hearing. But |
| it would consider the effects of | | | | again, this case shows the rules have |
| "obesity" with regard to other listed | | | | changed and "obesity" no longer is the |
| impairments such as respiratory | | | | "slam dunk" winner it once was. |
| impairments, cardiovascular impairments, | | | | This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT |
| and muscoloskeletal impairments (back | | | | or Advertising Material under the Rules |
| problems). | | | | of Professional Conduct governing |
| In a recent case I had a young lady who | | | | lawyers in Virginia. This note is |
| was 400 pounds and had spinal stenosis. | | | | designed for general information only. |
| Prior to 1999, she probably would have | | | | The information presented in this note |
| met the Impairment Listing for | | | | should not be construed to be formal |
| "obesity". Since the rules have changed, | | | | legal advice nor the formation of a |
| we had to go to a hearing before a judge | | | | lawyer/client relationship. |
| and demonstrate the severity of her back | | | | |