| Social Security has a set of Impairment | | | | of her back problem. We won but the primary |
| Listings. At one time "obesity" had an | | | | focus of the decision was on the back problem |
| impairment listing. Thus, if the applicant | | | | and not her "obesity." |
| was of a certain height and weight, then the | | | | |
| applicant received Disability. For example, | | | | In another case I had the applicant was a man |
| if you were 5'2" and 300 pounds, then you | | | | who was over 375 pounds with congestive heart |
| were well on your way to winning a Disability | | | | failure. Again, prior to 1999 he would have |
| Case if you had any impairments in addition | | | | met the "obesity" listing. Instead, we had |
| to your "obesity". | | | | the hearing and the judge denied the claim on |
| | | | the grounds he had not done enough to lose |
| In 1999, Social Security changed the Rules | | | | weight. The United States District Court |
| and deleted the Impairment Listing for | | | | reversed the social security judge and we are |
| "obesity". Social Security did say it would | | | | awaiting a new hearing. But again, this case |
| consider the effects of "obesity" with regard | | | | shows the rules have changed and "obesity" no |
| to other listed impairments such as | | | | longer is the "slam dunk" winner it once was. |
| respiratory impairments, cardiovascular | | | | |
| impairments, and muscoloskeletal impairments | | | | This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT or |
| (back problems). | | | | Advertising Material under the Rules of |
| | | | Professional Conduct governing lawyers in |
| In a recent case I had a young lady who was | | | | Virginia. This note is designed for general |
| 400 pounds and had spinal stenosis. Prior to | | | | information only. The information presented |
| 1999, she probably would have met the | | | | in this note should not be construed to be |
| Impairment Listing for "obesity". Since the | | | | formal legal advice nor the formation of a |
| rules have changed, we had to go to a hearing | | | | lawyer/client relationship. |
| before a judge and demonstrate the severity | | | | |